PermitPipeline
Home / Insights / SF permit applications, summer 2026

San Francisco permit applications fell 18% this summer. Same-day issuance fell to 42%.

Short answer: San Francisco logged 5,099 building-permit applications from May through July 2026, against 6,250 in the same months of 2025, down 18.4%. July's 1,506 was the lowest month in the 25-month series. Both main lanes fell: plan-reviewed alterations 94 to 75 and over-the-counter alterations 1,942 to 1,393. Of the permits the city did issue in July, 41.7% of over-the-counter permits issued the same day, against 59.1% a year earlier, and the median plan-reviewed alteration that got issued had waited 190 days, against 159. Electrical permits, tracked in a separate city file, fell 10.5% in July. Two filing systems, same direction.
Note: Counts of public applications and issuances, read at a fixed date. DBI back-dates its file, so a fresh pull moves by a few permits; the reconciliation extract shows every headline figure both ways. Not a forecast, not seasonally adjusted. Declared values are self-reported and are deliberately not the story here.
Data note: San Francisco DBI building permits, deduplicated on primary address (DataSF f2jc-ivnc), counted as distinct permit numbers, all statuses. Electrical permits from DataSF ftty-kx6y. Figures are from the August 2026 edition of the San Francisco Preconstruction Activity Index (extracted 2026-08-24); the row-level extracts were re-pulled 2026-09-17 and match the edition within two permits on every figure.

Applications: the lowest month in two years

Building-permit applications20252026Change
May to July6,2505,099-18.4%
July alone2,1281,506-29.2%
Index reading (100 = flat)81.6

The 25-month series on the SF Index page ranges from 1,506 to 2,264 applications a month. July 2026 is the floor of it.

Both main lanes fell. Only one of them is a story.

July applications by permit type, 2025 against 2026:

CategoryJul 2025Jul 2026Change
Over-the-counter alterations (type 8)1,9421,393-28%
Plan-reviewed additions, alterations, repairs (type 3)9475-20%
Sign, erect745
Demolitions32
New construction20

Both lanes down by a fifth to a quarter is the finding. The one that is not: among plan-reviewed filings, the median declared value went from $139,000 to $250,000. On 94 and 75 filings the confidence interval on that change runs from about minus $33,000 to plus $162,000 and includes zero, and declared values are self-reported and unaudited. It looks like a headline. It is noise.

Of what the city did issue, less of it was same-day

These figures cover permits actually issued in July, so they describe what came out of the queue, not what is still sitting in it.

Permits issued in July20252026
Over-the-counter permits issued1,8971,400
Over-the-counter issued the same day it was filed59.1%41.7%
Over-the-counter, median days filed to issued03
Plan-reviewed alterations, median days filed to issued159190

Same-day issuance is the over-the-counter promise. Fewer than half of July's over-the-counter permits kept it. Plan-reviewed alterations that got issued had waited a month longer than the year before. The SF permit timeline guide has the full distribution by permit type.

A second dataset, same direction

The city tracks electrical permits in a separate file. They fell too: 1,654 filed in July 2025, 1,480 in July 2026, down 10.5%. Two filing systems, one direction. The data does not say why, and this page is not going to guess.

Electrical permits filed (ftty-kx6y)Count
July 20251,654
July 20261,480

Thirteen of the fourteen neighborhoods that clear every screen fell

Fourteen San Francisco neighborhoods clear every screen the Index applies: enough prior-year volume to quote a percentage (at least 50 applications), a change of at least 15, and the same direction over the preceding six months. Thirteen of the fourteen fell.

Neighborhood, applications May to July20252026
Bayview Hunters Point (steepest)240150
Outer Richmond (largest by count)352246
Financial District / South Beach646539
Sunset / Parkside482415
West of Twin Peaks418333
Mission376307
Inner Sunset247179
North Beach (the one increase)78104

Four of the 41 analysis neighborhoods rose. Only three of those sit in the 33 with enough volume to quote a percentage. Visitacion Valley went 47 to 65, the biggest percentage rise in the city, on counts too small to lead with. All 41 are published with their counts, including the small areas most tables quietly drop; dropping them is how "three of 33" gets reported as if it were three of the city.

Check the rows yourself

Every table above has its rows published, re-pulled September 17 with the same filters the edition used. Same CC BY 4.0 licence as the tables: use them, cite the Index.

Questions people ask

Is this the number of permits issued or applied for?

Applications, counted by filed date, all statuses, unless a table says issued. The issuance table covers permits issued in July and measures the wait from filing to issuance for those permits only.

Why the deduplicated file and not the raw one?

A single permit can appear on several address rows in the raw file. DataSF publishes an official view deduplicated on primary address; the Index uses it and reconciles it against distinct permit numbers in the raw file every edition.

What does over-the-counter mean here?

Permit type 8 in the city's file: alterations that can be reviewed and issued at the counter without a full plan review. Same-day issuance is the share of those issued on the day they were filed.

Can I republish these tables?

Yes. The Index CSVs and the extracts are CC BY 4.0. Attribute to the PermitPipeline Preconstruction Activity Index with the edition date and the source URL.

Sources and downloads

San Francisco DBI building permits, deduplicated on primary address, f2jc-ivnc; electrical permits, ftty-kx6y. Tables: San Francisco Preconstruction Activity Index, August 2026 edition, methodology. CSVs: SF neighborhoods, monthly filings.

What should a contractor do with this?
  1. Check fit: does the scope, value, and location match your work?
  2. Identify the named parties: owner, architect, GC, or permittee.
  3. Confirm timing: how early is the filing, and is the team still forming?
  4. Decide the outreach path: GC, owner, architect, or an existing partner.
  5. Track updates: watch related permits and GC assignment.
Related guides: construction leads · building permit leads · preconstruction leads · NYC construction leads